![]() The walls of the family dwelling symbolized these divisions, physically as well as psychologically. In architectural forms, prescriptive advice, and individual habits, there was new attentiveness to fortifying the borders between private and public arenas. Private property and the “affective private life of the family” became tightly linked across the nineteenth century. This revaluation of privacy was linked to the emergence of the “home”-as distinct from the household or the physical house-as an idealized bourgeois realm of domesticity. ![]() ![]() Already by the turn of the nineteenth century, privacy carried far more positive connotations, unlike the similar terms of “alienation, loneliness, ostracism, and isolation.” Not simply the condition of being alone, privacy was coming to refer to a set of ideas about personal freedom and individual autonomy, an “inner uncoerced realm.” It denoted an interior sanctuary as much as an exterior, physical one. Linked etymologically to selfishness-the love of one’s own private interests-as well as deprivation, the concept was undergoing a slow metamorphosis. Privacy had once been considered a form of privation, implied by the Latin privatus and privare. It trailed the evolving meaning of the word privacy itself. Until the last quarter of the nineteenth century-when growing corporate and state power as well as new citizenship claims would press the issue-privacy remained largely dormant as a public language.Īt the same time, however, a more fulsome notion of the private sphere and its prerogatives was taking root.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |